PERBANDINGAN NLP DAN SVM DALAM ANALISIS SENTIMEN KOMENTAR INSTAGRAM TERKAIT STIGMA MASYARAKAT TERHADAP BANJIR SUMATERA 2025

Authors

  • Muhammad Akbar Firdaus
  • Maisya Fitri Anugrah
  • Sri Hidayati
  • Dedy Rahman Harahap
  • Rendy Rabensi Sembiring
  • Muhammad Syahputra Novelan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v9i2.6176

Keywords:

Sentiment Analysis, Natural Language Processing, IndoBERT

Abstract

This study aims to analyze public sentiment regarding the 2025 Sumatra flood based on Instagram comments using a Natural Language Processing (NLP) approach. The methods applied include IndoBERT and Support Vector Machine (SVM) with TF-IDF features. A total of 711 comments were collected through a crawling process and processed using preprocessing techniques. The results show that negative sentiment dominates at 44.7%, followed by positive (30.4%) and neutral (24.9%) sentiments. Model evaluation indicates that IndoBERT outperforms SVM with an accuracy of 74.8% compared to 66.4%. WordCloud visualization reveals dominant terms such as flood, government, forest, and palm oil, reflecting public concerns about environmental issues and government policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. NAACL-HLT.

Ellison, & B, N. (2008). Social Network Sites : Definition , History , and Scholarship. 13, 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x

Firmansyah, & Aditya. (2010). Situs Jejaring Sosial Menggunakan Elgg.

Haris and D. Eka Ratnawati, “Analisis Sentimen berbasis Aspek terhadap Data Ulasan menggunakan Metode K-Nearest Neighbor (Studi Kasus: Aplikasi Olsera POS),” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 3041–3046, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id

Hidayat, W. A., & Nastiti, V. R. S. (2024). Perbandingan kinerja pre-trained IndoBERT-base dan IndoBERT-lite pada klasifikasi sentimen ulasan TikTok Tokopedia Seller Center dengan model IndoBERT. JSiI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi), 11(2), 13-20.

Hu, Manikonda, & Kambhampati. (2014). What We Instagram : A First Analysis of Instagram Photo Content and User Types. McCune 2011, 595–598.

Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2021). Speech and Language Processing.

Julianto, I. T., & Lindawati, L. (2022). Analisis sentimen terhadap sistem informasi akademik Institut Teknologi Garut. Jurnal Algoritma, 19(1), 458-468

Koto, F., Rahimi, A., Lau, J., & Baldwin, T. (2020). IndoLEM and IndoBERT: A Benchmark Dataset and Pre-trained Language Model for Indonesian NLP. COLING.

Lesmana, Gusti Ngurah Aditya. 2012. “Analisis Pengaruh Media Sosial Twitter Terhadap Pembentukan Brand Attachment.” Universitas Indonesia.

Liu, K., Li, W., & Guo, M. (2012). Emoticon Smoothed Language Models for Twitter Sentiment Analysis. 1678–1684.

Pranata, J. O. N. I., Agustian, S., & Haerani, E. (2024). Penggunaan Model Bahasa indoBERT pada Metode Random Forest Untuk Klasifikasi Sentimen Dengan Dataset Terbatas. vol, 6, 1668-1676

R. Gupta, D. Srivastava, M. Sahu, S. Tiwari, R. K. Ambasta, and P. Kumar, “Artificial intelligence to deep learning: machine intelligence approach for drug discovery,” Mol Divers, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1315–1360, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11030-021-10217-3

Setiawan, Y., & Wulandhari, L. A. (2025). Comparative Analysis of IndoBERT and LSTM for Multi-Label Text Classification of Indonesian Motivation Letter. Jurnal Online Informatika, 10(2), 260-269.

Tarumingkeng, R. C. (2024). Natural Language Processing (NLP). RUDYCT e-PRESS, no.

Wibowo, J. A., Mawardi, V. C., & Sutrisno, T. (2024). Visualisasi word cloud hasil analisis sentimen berbasis fitur layanan aplikasi gojek dengan support vector machine. Jurnal Serina Sains, Teknik dan Kedokteran, 2(1), 61-70.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08

Issue

Section

Artikel

How to Cite

PERBANDINGAN NLP DAN SVM DALAM ANALISIS SENTIMEN KOMENTAR INSTAGRAM TERKAIT STIGMA MASYARAKAT TERHADAP BANJIR SUMATERA 2025. (2026). JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH, 9(2), 2298-2304. https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v9i2.6176

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 > >>