THE EFFECTS OF METACOGNITIVE ONLINE READING STRATEGIES ON MOTIVATION TO LEARN ENGLISH OF FKIP SAINT THOMAS UNIVERSITY IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2022/2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v6i1.1167Abstract
Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi strategi yang efektif untuk mengajar bahasa Inggris sebagai kemampuan membaca bahasa asing. Penekanan utama adalah pada penggunaan strategi metakognitif untuk merefleksikan proses mental yang terjadi sebelum dan sesudah proses membaca dengan menggunakan teks online digital. Sampel penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa semester satu Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Katolik Saint Thomas Sumatera Utara. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Teknik analisis data dilakukan dalam dua tahap. Langkah pertama adalah mengidentifikasi setiap potongan data sesuai dengan jenis yang terdapat dalam domain kognitif. Langkah kedua adalah hasil analisis domain kognitif yang ditinjau berdasarkan strategi metakognitif meliputi proses perencanaan, pemantauan dan evaluasi. Pembelajaran ini dilakukan berdasarkan beberapa proses kognitif, seperti mengingat, memahami, menerapkan, menganalisis, mengevaluasi, dan mencipta. Penelitian ini menyarankan bahwa siswa harus memiliki pengalaman untuk mengaktifkan dan membangun sumber yang kaya dan relevan untuk menemukan jawaban bacaan dengan menggunakan membaca online metakognitif untuk terlibat dalam kegiatan pencarian informasi untuk membangun pembelajaran mandiri dan meningkatkan tingkat membaca dalam teks online.Downloads
References
Akmal, Z., & Abd, B. (2020). Assessing the Metacognitive Awareness of Online Reading Strategies among Pre- University Students Kulliyah of Education Kulliyah of Education Kulliyah of Education To cite this article : Hamid , Z . A . A ., Ahmad , I . S ., Nordin , M . S . & Rahman , Z . 2(2), 19–31.
Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2011). Assessing metacognition in an online community of inquiry. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.01.005
Chakma, U., Li, B., & Kabuhung, G. (2021). Creating online metacognitive spaces: Graduate research writing during the covid-19 pandemic. Issues in Educational Research, 31(1), 37–55.
Chifari, A., Chiazzese, G., Seta, L., Merlo, G., Ottaviano, S., & Allegra, M. (2010). A reflection on some critical aspects of online reading comprehension. Informatica (Ljubljana), 34(4), 491–495.
Dewi, K. S., & Sahiruddin. (2020). Online Reading Culture Among Indonesian EFL Students at Tertiary Education Level. Jurnal Studi Budaya Nusantara, 4(2), 104–117. https://jsbn.ub.ac.id/index.php/sbn/article/view/98
Francisco, D. C. (2021). The Learning Style of Students and Its Effect on Their Metacognitive Awareness during COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research, 5(1), 123–129. www.ijeais.org/ijamr
Ginting, F. Y. A. (2021). Transition words progression of written texts made by the second-semester students of the English study program of FKIP Saint Thomas University in academic year 2019/2020. Britain International of Linguistics Arts and Education (BIoLAE) Journal, 3(1), 29-41.
Hettiarachchi, S., Damayanthi, B. W. R., Heenkenda, S., Dissanayake, D. M. S. L. B., Ranagalage, M., & Ananda, L. (2021). Student satisfaction with online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A study at state universities in Sri Lanka. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(21), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111749
Huang, H. C. (2014). Online versus paper-based instruction: Comparing two strategy training modules for improving reading comprehension. RELC Journal, 45(2), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214534797
Ibabe, I., & Jauregizar, J. (2010). Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge. Higher Education, 59(2), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9245-6
Jusoh, Z., & Abdullah, L. (2016). Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS): Students’ Online Reading in Academic Context. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 17(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.21315/mjde2015.17.2.5
Karlen, Y. (2016). Differences in students’ metacognitive strategy knowledge, motivation, and strategy use: A typology of self-regulated learners. Journal of Educational Research, 109(3), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.942895
Kuama, S. (2016). Is Online Learning Suitable for All English Language Students? PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 52(December), 53–82.
Lee, Y., Kigamwa, J. C., Pookcharoen, S., & In, V. (2013). Exploring Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies among University Students in Four Nonnative English Speaking Countries. International Journal of Literacy, Culture, and Language Education, 2, 97–118. https://doi.org/10.14434/ijlcle.v2i0.26892
Marboot, K., Roohani, A., & Mirzaei, A. (2020). Investigating Iranian EFL Students’ Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies, Critical Thinking, and Their Relationship: A Mixed-Methods Study. Issues in Language Teaching, 9(1), 151–182. https://go.exlibris.link/6PJjGQng
Mudra, H. (2018). Metacognitive Online Reading Strategies among Pre-Service EFL Teachers in Indonesia. Educational Process: International Journal, 7(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2018.72.5
Shirvani, M., & Porkar, R. (2022). Online-Based L2 Writing Courses and Practicing Metacognitive Strategies: Teacher-Regulated or Individualized? Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(7), 1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1207.23
Stevani, M., & Ginting, F. Y. A. (2022). English Teachers’ Perspectives of Learner Autonomy in Online Reading Comprehension in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Teaching and Learning in Elementary Education (JTLEE), 5(2), 166-189.
Stevani, M., Prayuda, M. S., Sari, D. W., Marianus, S. M., & Tarigan, K. E. (2022). Evaluation of Contextual Clues: EFL Proficiency in Reading Comprehension. English Review: Journal of English Education, 10(3), 993-1002.
Stevani, M., & Tarigan, K. E. (2023). Evaluating English textbooks by using Bloom’s taxonomy to analyze reading comprehension question. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education, 4(1), 1-18.
Sun, Y. C. (2003). Extensive reading online: An overview and evaluation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(4), 438–446. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.00048.x
Wilson, N. S., & Smetana, L. (2011). Questioning as thinking: A metacognitive framework to improve comprehension of expository text. Literacy, 45(2), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4369.2011.00584.x
Zhang, W., Zhang, D., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Metacognitive instruction for sustainable learning: Learners’ perceptions of task difficulty and use of metacognitive strategies in completing integrated speaking tasks. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11).
