Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): May 2025
Artikel

PENGARUH TURBULENSI DAN KEBERLANJUTAN LINGKUNGAN TERHADAP KINERJA FINANSIAL IKM DI KOTA PADANG

PDF
  • Hary Fandeli,
  • Novirman Jamarun,
  • Ruhil Amani Jozura Putri,
  • Fathila Fausta Alvendri
Hary Fandeli
Universitas Andalas
Novirman Jamarun
Universitas Andalas
Ruhil Amani Jozura Putri
Universitas Andalas
Fathila Fausta Alvendri
Universitas Andalas

Published 2025-05-11

How to Cite

PENGARUH TURBULENSI DAN KEBERLANJUTAN LINGKUNGAN TERHADAP KINERJA FINANSIAL IKM DI KOTA PADANG. (2025). JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH, 8(2), 1254-1265. https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v8i2.2404

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to analyze the impact of environmental turbulence on environmental sustainability and financial performance of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Padang City, with environmental sustainability as a mediating variable. Environmental turbulence, including market changes, policies, and economic dynamics, is considered a significant challenge for SMEs to survive amidst uncertainties. The study applies Partial Least Square - Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) using data collected through questionnaires from SME owners and employees. The findings reveal that environmental turbulence does not have a direct significant impact on financial performance but positively affects environmental sustainability. Furthermore, environmental sustainability significantly contributes to improving SMEs’ financial performance. These results indicate that adopting sustainability practices, such as reducing resource usage and producing environmentally friendly products, can serve as a vital adaptive strategy to enhance efficiency, competitiveness, and profitability in the long term. This study recommends the importance of government and stakeholder support in helping SMEs integrate sustainability into their operations to create stability amidst business environment dynamics.

 

Keywords: Environmental Turbulence; Environmental Sustainability; Financial

                 Performance; Small and Medium Enterprises.

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh turbulensi lingkungan terhadap keberlanjutan lingkungan dan kinerja finansial Industri Kecil dan Menengah (IKM) di Kota Padang, dengan keberlanjutan lingkungan sebagai variabel mediasi. Turbulensi lingkungan, yang mencakup perubahan pasar, kebijakan, serta dinamika ekonomi, dianggap sebagai tantangan utama bagi IKM untuk bertahan di tengah ketidakpastian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode Partial Least Square - Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM) dengan data yang dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dari pemilik dan karyawan IKM. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa turbulensi lingkungan tidak memiliki dampak langsung signifikan terhadap kinerja finansial IKM, tetapi memiliki pengaruh positif signifikan terhadap keberlanjutan lingkungan. Sementara itu, keberlanjutan lingkungan terbukti berkontribusi secara signifikan terhadap peningkatan kinerja finansial IKM. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa penerapan praktik keberlanjutan, seperti pengurangan penggunaan sumber daya dan produksi ramah lingkungan, dapat menjadi strategi adaptasi penting untuk meningkatkan efisiensi, daya saing, dan profitabilitas jangka panjang. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pentingnya dukungan pemerintah dan pemangku kepentingan dalam membantu IKM mengintegrasikan keberlanjutan dalam operasional mereka untuk menciptakan stabilitas di tengah dinamika lingkungan bisnis.

 

Kata kunci: Turbulensi Lingkungan; Keberlanjutan Lingkungan; Kinerja Finansial; Industri Kecil dan Menengah.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Afifahtus Syaleha, & Muhammad Yasin. (2024). Pola IKM dan UMKM di Bali. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 2(2), 09–16. https://doi.org/10.61132/jepi.v2i2.482
  2. Arici, T., & Gok, M. S. (2023). Examining environmental turbulence intensity: A strategic agility and innovativeness approach on firm performance in environmental turbulence situations. Sustainability, 15(6), 5364.
  3. Arif, N. P., & Handayani, N. (2024). Financial Performance Mediates the Effect of Sustainability Reporting on Firm Value. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 22(2), 188–219.
  4. Chang, A., & Cheng, Y. (2019). Analysis model of the sustainability development of manufacturing small and medium- sized enterprises in Taiwan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 458–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.025
  5. Conesa, I. M., Soto-acosta, P., & Palacios-manzano, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and fi rm performance : An empirical research in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2374–2383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.038
  6. Erlangga, H., Setiawati, T., Riadi, F., Hindarsah, I., & Riani, D. (2024). Adaptive Strategies in Entrepreneurial Ventures: Navigating Uncertainty and Market Dynamics at MSMe. Jurnal Ekonomi Utama, 3(1), 1–9.
  7. Fandeli, H., Hasan, A., & Amrina, E. (2020). Model Konseptual Pengaruh Keberlanjutan terhadap Kinerja Industri Kecil dan Menengah. Dampak, 17(1), 15–24.
  8. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
  9. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  10. Hanim, S. H., Novita, A.-R., Ariffin, S. R., Ghazilla, R., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). The impact of sustainable manufacturing practices on sustainability performance: empirical evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(2), 241–249.
  11. Haryono, S. (2016). Metode SEM untuk Penelitian Manajemen AMOS LISREL PLS. PT. Intermedia Personalia Utama.
  12. Herissuparman, E., Ismane, M. A., & Ashari, H. (2024). MSMEs and Rural Prosperity: A Study of their Influence in Indonesian Agriculture and Rural Economy. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), 9(6), 2020–2025. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jun1227
  13. Hessa, A., & Hanan, A. (2024). The Impact of Sustainability Practices on the Financial Performance of Listed Companies in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 30(7), 38-46.
  14. Hsu, C., Chang, A., & Luo, W. (2017). Identifying key performance factors for sustainability development of SMEs - integrating QFD and fuzzy MADM methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.063
  15. Ichdan, D. A., & Maryani, M. (n.d.). The impact of innovation, corporate social responsibility, environmental practices, and organizational culture on organizational sustainability. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 5(4), 297–310.
  16. Joung, C. B., Carrell, J., Sarkar, P., & Feng, S. C. (2013). Categorization of indicators for sustainable manufacturing. Ecological Indicators, 24, 148–157.
  17. Madridâ€Guijarro, A., & Duréndez, A. (2024). Sustainable development barriers and pressures in SMEs: The mediating effect of management commitment to environmental practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(2), 949–967.
  18. Mangkau, I. D. (2024). Green Environmental Practices in SMEs. International Journal of Academic Research in Business And Social Sciences, 14(6), 529–542.
  19. Matinaro, V., Liu, Y., Lee, T., & Poesche, J. (2019). Extracting key factors for sustainable development of enterprises : Case study of SMEs in Taiwan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 1152–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.280
  20. Mokhtarzadeh, N. G., Mahdiraji, H. A., Jafarpanah, I., & Cao, D. (2022). Examining the influence of environmental turbulence on firm innovation performance in emerging markets: using an environment-strategy-performance framework. International Journal of Innovation Management, 26((04), 2250028).
  21. Natarajan, G. S., & Wyrick, D. A. (2011). Framework for implementing sustainable practices in SMEs in the United States. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, 1(1), 6–13.
  22. Pirrone, G., & Milotta, M. (2024). Entrepreneurial Culture and Continuous Improvement to Handle Environmental Turbulence. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 18(1), 1465–1476.
  23. Pratono, A. H., & Mahmood, R. (2014). The Moderating Effect of Environmental Turbulence in the Relationship between Entrepreneurial Management and Firm Performance. Universal Journal of Management, 2(7), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujm.2014.020704
  24. Qumayroh, N. P., Girsang, I. V., & B, R. D. D. L. (2024). Kajian Strategis Umkm Kuliner Di Era Modern Di Kota Palangkaraya. JRIME: JURNAL RISET MANAJEMEN DAN EKONOMI, 2(3), 25–49.
  25. Shingo, S. (2019). A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System. In A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315136479
  26. Turulja, L., & Bajgoric, N. (2019). Innovation, firms’ performance and environmental turbulence: is there a moderator or mediator? European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 213–232.
  27. Widyaningdyah, A. U., & Gabriella. (2023). Environmental turbulence, dynamic capabilities and business growth in small and medium enterprises in east java, indonesia. The International Journal of Business & Management, 11(7).
  28. Zulu-Chisanga, S., Boso, N., Adeola, B., & Oghazi, P. (2016). Investigating the path from firm innovativeness to financial performance: the roles of new product success, market responsiveness, and environment turbulence. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 26(1), 51–68.