KESUKSESAN IMPLEMENTASI SIAKAD DI UNIVERSITAS ROYAL: INTEGRASI MODEL D&M, TAM, UTAUT, DAN HABIT

Authors

  • Hainur Rasyid Universitas Royal
  • Raja Tama Andri Agus Universitas Royal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v9i3.6733

Keywords:

SIAKAD, DeLone & McLean, Habit, Structural Equation Modeling, Mandatory System

Abstract

Abstract: This study examines the factors affecting the success of Academic Information System (SIAKAD) implementation at Royal University using an integrated theoretical framework of the DeLone & McLean IS Success Model, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). The primary contribution of this study is the empirical examination of the Habit construct from UTAUT, which has not been previously tested in the Indonesian SIAKAD context based on the literature reviewed. A quantitative cross-sectional approach was employed using two-stage Structural Equation Modeling (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988) with jamovi 2.6/SEMLj. Data were collected from 270 respondents via stratified random sampling from a population of 8,193 users. The measurement model demonstrated acceptable fit (χ²/df=2.87, RMSEA=0.083, CFI=0.938, TLI=0.928, SRMR=0.037). Results indicate that Habit (β=0.773, p<0.001) is the dominant predictor of Usage Intensity, Information Quality (β=0.996, p=0.006) is the only quality dimension that significantly predicts User Satisfaction, and User Satisfaction (β=0.756, p<0.001) is the strongest predictor of Net Benefits. The high R² values (UI=0.910; US=0.792; NB=0.877) confirm that in long-term mandatory information system environments, habitual usage patterns are more predictive than system quality dimensions in explaining usage intensity.

Keywords: SIAKAD; DeLone & McLean; Habit; Structural Equation Modeling; Mandatory System

 

Abstrak: Penelitian ini mengkaji faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kesuksesan implementasi SIAKAD di Universitas Royal menggunakan kerangka terpadu DeLone & McLean IS Success Model, TAM, dan UTAUT. Kontribusi utama penelitian ini adalah pengujian konstruk Habit dari UTAUT yang belum pernah diuji secara empiris dalam konteks SIAKAD Indonesia berdasarkan kajian literatur yang dilakukan. Pendekatan kuantitatif cross-sectional diterapkan menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling dua tahap (Anderson & Gerbing, 1988) dengan jamovi 2.6/SEMLj. Data dikumpulkan dari 270 responden melalui stratified random sampling (N=8.193). Model CFA menunjukkan fit yang dapat diterima (χ²/df=2,87, RMSEA=0,083, CFI=0,938, TLI=0,928, SRMR=0,037). Hasil menunjukkan Habit (β=0,773, p<0,001) sebagai prediktor dominan Intensitas Penggunaan, Kualitas Informasi (β=0,996, p=0,006) sebagai satu-satunya dimensi kualitas yang secara signifikan memprediksi Kepuasan Pengguna, dan Kepuasan Pengguna (β=0,756, p<0,001) sebagai prediktor terkuat Manfaat Bersih. Nilai R² tinggi (UI=0,910; US=0,792; NB=0,877) mengkonfirmasi bahwa dalam lingkungan SI wajib jangka panjang, pola penggunaan habitual lebih prediktif dibandingkan dimensi kualitas sistem dalam menjelaskan intensitas penggunaan.

Kata kunci: SIAKAD; DeLone & McLean; Habit; SEM; Sistem Wajib

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Adwan, A. S., Albelbisi, N. A., Hujran, O., Al-Rahmi, W. M., & Alkhalifah, A. (2021). Developing a holistic success model for sustainable e-learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Sustainability, 13(16), 9453.

Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411

Brown, S. A., Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Burkman, J. R. (2002). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 283–295.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.

Hidayat, A., & Santoso, B. (2022). Analisis penerimaan SIAKAD menggunakan TAM di universitas

Indonesia. JNTETI, 10(1), 12–23.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

Irawan, S., Foster, S., & Tanner, K. (2018). The mandated adoption and implementation of an academic information system: Empirical evidence from an Indonesian university. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22.

Jaoua, F., Almurad, H. M., Elshaer, I. A., & Mohamed, E. S. (2022). E-learning success model in the context of COVID-19 pandemic in higher educational institutions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2865.

Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G., & Cheung, C. M. K. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 705–737.

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149.

Mehrolia, S., Alagarsamy, S., & Sabari, M. I. (2021). Moderating effects of academic involvement in web-based learning management system success: A multigroup analysis. Heliyon, 7, e07000.

Ramdhani, R. (2021). Evaluasi kesuksesan sistem informasi akademik menggunakan model DeLone & McLean. Jurnal Informasi Sistem, 15(2), 45–58.

Sayaf, A. M. (2023). Adoption of E-learning systems: An integration of ISSM and constructivism theories in higher education. Heliyon, 9, e13014.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.

Verplanken, B., & Wood, W. (2006). Interventions to break and create consumer habits. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25(1), 90–103.

Wood, W., & Neal, D. T. (2007). A new look at habits and the habit-goal interface. Psychological Review, 114(4), 843–863.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): June 2026

Section

Artikel

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Hainur Rasyid, Raja Tama Andri Agus

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

KESUKSESAN IMPLEMENTASI SIAKAD DI UNIVERSITAS ROYAL: INTEGRASI MODEL D&M, TAM, UTAUT, DAN HABIT. (2026). JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH, 9(3), 5060-5066. https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v9i3.6733

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>