SIGMA CONVERGENCE OF LABOUR PRODUCTIVITY ACROSS INDONESIAN PROVINCES, 2016–2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54314/zpgtm925Keywords:
coefficient of variation, labour productivity, regional disparity, sigma convergence, IndonesiaAbstract
Abstract: Labour productivity in Indonesia remains highly uneven across provinces: output per worker in DKI Jakarta is about sixteen times that of Nusa Tenggara Timur. This study examines whether these disparities narrowed between 2016 and 2025 by testing sigma convergence across 34 provinces. Labour productivity is measured as real Gross Regional Domestic Product at 2010 constant prices per employed person, using data from Statistics Indonesia (BPS) processed by the Ministry of Manpower. Dispersion is measured by the coefficient of variation (CV), and its change is evaluated with a linear trend regression and the Carree–Klomp test, supplemented by robustness checks that exclude outlying provinces. The CV was 0.767 in 2016 and 0.769 in 2025, with no significant trend (p = 0.602) and no significant change in log variance (T₂ = 0.499; p = 0.480); sigma convergence is therefore not found for Indonesia as a whole. A spike to 0.860 in 2023 reflects an exceptional value for Papua. When DKI Jakarta, Papua, and Papua Barat are excluded, the CV of the remaining 31 provinces falls significantly from 0.697 to 0.626 (δ = −0.0076 per year; p < 0.001), although the decline has stalled since 2021. National dispersion is thus sustained by Jakarta’s widening lead and by volatile data for Papua, while the least productive provinces in eastern Indonesia continue to lag. Policy should prioritise productivity-raising investment in lagging provinces and improve the consistency of provincial statistics after administrative splits.
Keyword: Coefficient of variation, Labour productivity, Regional disparity, Sigma convergence, Indonesia
Abstrak: Produktivitas tenaga kerja di Indonesia masih sangat timpang antarprovinsi: output per pekerja di DKI Jakarta sekitar enam belas kali lipat dibandingkan dengan di Nusa Tenggara Timur. Studi ini mengkaji apakah kesenjangan tersebut menyempit antara tahun 2016 dan 2025 dengan menguji konvergensi sigma di 34 provinsi. Produktivitas tenaga kerja diukur sebagai Produk Domestik Regional Bruto (PDRB) riil atas dasar harga konstan tahun 2010 per orang yang bekerja, menggunakan data dari Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) yang diolah oleh Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan. Dispersi diukur dengan koefisien variasi (CV), dan perubahannya dievaluasi menggunakan regresi tren linear serta uji Carree–Klomp, yang dilengkapi dengan pemeriksaan ketahanan (robustness check) dengan mengecualikan provinsi-provinsi yang menjadi pencilan (outlier). Nilai CV tercatat sebesar 0,767 pada tahun 2016 dan 0,769 pada tahun 2025, tanpa tren yang signifikan (p = 0,602) dan tanpa perubahan signifikan pada varians log (T₂ = 0,499; p = 0,480); dengan demikian, konvergensi sigma tidak ditemukan untuk Indonesia secara keseluruhan. Lonjakan ke angka 0,860 pada tahun 2023 mencerminkan nilai yang luar biasa untuk Papua. Ketika DKI Jakarta, Papua, dan Papua Barat dikecualikan, nilai CV dari 31 provinsi sisanya turun secara signifikan dari 0,697 menjadi 0,626 (δ = −0,0076 per tahun; p < 0,001), meskipun penurunan tersebut terhenti sejak tahun 2021. Dengan demikian, dispersi nasional tetap bertahan karena keunggulan Jakarta yang kian melebar serta data Papua yang fluktuatif, sementara provinsi-provinsi dengan tingkat produktivitas terendah di wilayah timur Indonesia terus tertinggal. Kebijakan harus memprioritaskan investasi untuk meningkatkan produktivitas di provinsi-provinsi yang tertinggal serta memperbaiki konsistensi statistik provinsi setelah adanya pemekaran wilayah administratif.
Kata kunci: Koefisien variasi, Produktivitas tenaga kerja, Kesenjangan regional, Konvergensi sigma, Indonesia
Downloads
References
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2026). Produk domestik regional bruto atas dasar harga konstan 2010 menurut provinsi, 2016–2025 [Gross regional domestic product at 2010 constant prices by province, 2016–2025] [Data set]. https://www.bps.go.id
Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100(2), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1086/261816
Bhattarai, K., & Qin, W. (2022). Convergence in labor productivity across provinces and production sectors in China. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 25, e00247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2022.e00247
Brondino, G., Fora-Alcalde, F., & Casaú-Guirao, M. Á. (2025). Distribution dynamics of alternative productivity measures: An empirical analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 74, 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2025.03.008
Carree, M., & Klomp, L. (1997). Testing the convergence hypothesis: A comment. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 683–686.
Friedman, M. (1992). Do old fallacies ever die? Journal of Economic Literature, 30(4), 2129–2132.
Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan. (2026). Produktivitas tenaga kerja menurut provinsi, 2016–2025 (Sakernas Agustus, diolah Pusdatik Kemnaker) [Labour productivity by province, 2016–2025] [Data set]. https://kemnaker.go.id
Kurniawati, S. (2019). Regional income and its convergence in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 9(6), 77–83.
Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(2), 407–437. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118477
Nasution, N., & Wahyuni, K. (2022). Industrialization and convergence of West Java manufacturing labor productivity, Indonesia. Jejak: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan, 15(1), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v15i1.33459
Novianto, A. F., & Marsisno, W. (2019). Labor productivity convergence in Indonesia: Spatially dynamic panel data analysis. Eko-Regional: Jurnal Pengembangan Ekonomi Wilayah, 14(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.erjpe.2019.14.2.1291
Ortega-Díaz, A., & Santillán-Salgado, R. J. (2024). Labor productivity convergence among Eurozone member countries. Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época, 19(2), e1018. https://doi.org/10.21919/remef.v19i2.1018
Quah, D. (1993). Galton’s fallacy and tests of the convergence hypothesis. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 95(4), 427–443.
Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996). The classical approach to convergence analysis. The Economic Journal, 106(437), 1019–1036.
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
Wahyuni, R. N. T. (2024). Regional convergence and spatial shift-share analysis of labor productivity in Indonesia. Signifikan: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi, 13(2), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjie.v13i2.39092
Young, A. T., Higgins, M. J., & Levy, D. (2008). Sigma convergence versus beta convergence: Evidence from U.S. cou
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Silvia Rosalinda, Meiran Panggabean, Sri Kurniawati (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









