KECERDASAN BUDAYA DAN PERILAKU KERJA INOVATIF: MEDIASI KETERLIBATAN KERJA PADA DINAS PERINDUSTRIAN, PERDAGANGAN, KOPERASI, USAHA KECIL DAN MENENGAH PROVINSI RIAU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v9i5.7329Keywords:
kecerdasan budaya, perilaku kerja inovatif, keterlibatan kerja, PLS-SEM, sektor publikAbstract
Abstract: This study examines the effect of cultural intelligence on innovative work behavior and the mediating role of work engagement among employees of the Office of Industry, Trade, Cooperatives, and Small and Medium Enterprises (DPKUKM) of Riau Province. A quantitative survey design was used. From a population of 120 employees, 92 respondents were selected using the Krejcie and Morgan table and systematic random sampling. Data were collected with a five-point Likert questionnaire and analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 3.0. All indicators met the loading, AVE, and reliability criteria, although discriminant validity between cultural intelligence and innovative work behavior was not fully established. Cultural intelligence had a positive and significant effect on innovative work behavior (β = 0.709; p < 0.001) and on work engagement (β = 0.841; p < 0.001). Work engagement had a positive and significant effect on innovative work behavior (β = 0.219; p = 0.006) and partially mediated the effect of cultural intelligence on innovative work behavior (β = 0.185; p = 0.007; VAF = 20.7%). The model explained 70.8% of the variance in work engagement and 81.3% in innovative work behavior. Cultural intelligence acts as a personal resource that fosters innovative work behavior among public employees, both directly and through higher work engagement.
Keyword: cultural intelligence; innovative work behavior; work engagement; PLS-SEM; public sector.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji pengaruh kecerdasan budaya terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif serta peran keterlibatan kerja sebagai mediator pada pegawai Dinas Perindustrian, Perdagangan, Koperasi, Usaha Kecil dan Menengah (DPKUKM) Provinsi Riau. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode survei. Dari populasi 120 pegawai, sebanyak 92 responden ditentukan dengan tabel Krejcie dan Morgan melalui systematic random sampling. Data dikumpulkan dengan kuesioner skala Likert lima poin dan dianalisis menggunakan Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) dengan SmartPLS 3.0. Seluruh indikator memenuhi kriteria loading, AVE, dan reliabilitas, meskipun validitas diskriminan antara kecerdasan budaya dan perilaku kerja inovatif belum terpenuhi sepenuhnya. Kecerdasan budaya berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif (β = 0,709; p < 0,001) dan keterlibatan kerja (β = 0,841; p < 0,001). Keterlibatan kerja berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif (β = 0,219; p = 0,006) serta memediasi secara parsial pengaruh kecerdasan budaya terhadap perilaku kerja inovatif (β = 0,185; p = 0,007; VAF = 20,7%). Model menjelaskan 70,8% variasi keterlibatan kerja dan 81,3% variasi perilaku kerja inovatif. Kecerdasan budaya berperan sebagai sumber daya pribadi yang mendorong perilaku kerja inovatif aparatur, baik secara langsung maupun melalui peningkatan keterlibatan kerja.
Kata kunci: kecerdasan budaya; perilaku kerja inovatif; keterlibatan kerja; PLS-SEM;
sektor publik.
Downloads
References
Afsar, B., Al-Ghazali, B. M., Cheema, S.,
& Javed, F. (2020). Cultural intelligence and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and interpersonal trust. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(4), 1082–1109.
Afsar, B., Badir, Y. F., & Saeed, B. B. (2014). Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(8), 1270–1300.
Ang, S., Van Dyne, L., Koh, C., Ng, K. Y., Templer, K. J., Tay, C., & Chandrasekar, N. A. (2007). Cultural intelligence: Its measurement and effects on cultural judgment and decision making, cultural adaptation and task performance. Management and Organization Review, 3(3), 335–371.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.
Bogilović, S., Černe, M., & Škerlavaj, M. (2017). Hiding behind a mask? Cultural intelligence, knowledge hiding, and individual and team creativity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 26(5), 710–723.
Brislin, R., Worthley, R., & MacNab, B. (2006). Cultural intelligence: Understanding behaviors that serve people's goals. Group & Organization Management, 31(1), 40–55.
Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 89–136.
Crotty, S. K., & Brett, J. M. (2012). Fusing creativity: Cultural metacognition and teamwork in multicultural teams. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 5(2), 210–234.
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation
Management, 19(1), 23–36.
Elenkov, D. S., & Manev, I. M. (2009). Senior expatriate leadership's effects on innovation and the role of cultural intelligence. Journal of World Business, 44(4), 357–369.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.
Kim, W., & Park, J. (2017). Examining structural relationships between work engagement, organizational procedural justice, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior for sustainable organizations. Sustainability, 9(2),
Korzilius, H., Bücker, J. J. L. E., & Beerlage, S. (2017). Multiculturalism and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 56, 13–24.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., &
Salanova, M. (2006). The
measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Tay, C., Westman, M., & Chia, A. (2008). Antecedents and consequences of cultural intelligence among short-term business travelers. Dalam S. Ang & L. Van Dyne (Eds.), Handbook of cultural intelligence: Theory, measurement, and applications (hlm. 126–144). M. E. Sharpe.
Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 323–342.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Harry Pratama, Ririn Handayani, Nurliana Nasution (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
