PENGARUH CO-WORKER SUPPORT DAN FAMILY-FRIENDLY POLICIES AND PRACTICES TERHADAP WORK ENGAGEMENT DENGAN WORK-LIFE BALANCE DAN BEHAVIOURAL WORK-LIFE CONFLICT SEBAGAI VARIABEL MEDIASI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v9i5.7334Keywords:
co-worker support, family-friendly policies and practices, work engagement, work-life balance, behavioural work-life conflict, civil servantsAbstract
Abstract: This study examines the influence of Co-worker Support (CWS) and Family-Friendly Policies and Practices (FFPP) on Work Engagement (WE), both directly and indirectly through Work-Life Balance (WLB) and Behavioural Work-Life Conflict (BWLC) as mediating variables, among civil servants (ASN) in Tembilahan District, Indragiri Hilir Regency. A quantitative design was employed with a census of all 110 ASN at the District Office and eight sub-district offices. Data were collected through a seven-point Likert questionnaire and analysed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 3.2.9. The measurement model met the criteria of convergent validity, discriminant validity, and reliability. The model explained 19.8% of the variance in WLB, 30.0% in BWLC, and 30.8% in WE. CWS (β = 0.242; p = 0.001) and FFPP (β = 0.311; p = 0.000) positively affected WLB. Contrary to the hypothesised negative direction, CWS (β = 0.375; p = 0.000) and FFPP (β = 0.306; p = 0.003) positively affected BWLC, and BWLC positively affected WE (β = 0.408; p = 0.000). WLB, CWS, and FFPP had no significant direct effect on WE. BWLC significantly mediated the effects of CWS (β = 0.153; p = 0.005) and FFPP (β = 0.125; p = 0.026) on WE, whereas WLB did not. These findings indicate that BWLC is a more effective transmission mechanism than WLB in linking workplace resources to work engagement in the Indonesian public sector.
Keyword: co-worker support; family-friendly policies and practices; work engagement; work-life balance; behavioural work-life conflict; civil servants.
Abstrak: Penelitian ini menguji pengaruh Co-worker Support (CWS) dan Family-Friendly Policies and Practices (FFPP) terhadap Work Engagement (WE), baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung melalui Work-Life Balance (WLB) dan Behavioural Work-Life Conflict (BWLC) sebagai variabel mediasi pada Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) Kecamatan Tembilahan, Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan sensus terhadap seluruh 110 ASN di Kantor Camat dan delapan kantor kelurahan. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner skala Likert tujuh poin dan dianalisis dengan Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) menggunakan SmartPLS 3.2.9. Model pengukuran memenuhi kriteria validitas konvergen, validitas diskriminan, dan reliabilitas. Model menjelaskan 19,8% variasi WLB, 30,0% variasi BWLC, dan 30,8% variasi WE. CWS (β = 0,242; p = 0,001) dan FFPP (β = 0,311; p = 0,000) berpengaruh positif terhadap WLB. Berlawanan dengan arah negatif yang dihipotesiskan, CWS (β = 0,375; p = 0,000) dan FFPP (β = 0,306; p = 0,003) berpengaruh positif terhadap BWLC, dan BWLC berpengaruh positif terhadap WE (β = 0,408; p = 0,000). WLB, CWS, dan FFPP tidak berpengaruh langsung secara signifikan terhadap WE. BWLC terbukti memediasi pengaruh CWS (β = 0,153; p = 0,005) dan FFPP (β = 0,125; p = 0,026) terhadap WE, sedangkan WLB tidak. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa BWLC merupakan mekanisme transmisi yang lebih efektif dibandingkan WLB dalam menghubungkan sumber daya kerja dengan keterikatan kerja ASN di sektor publik Indonesia.
Kata kunci: co-worker support; family-friendly policies and practices; work engagement; work-life balance; behavioural work-life conflict; ASN.
Downloads
References
Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414–435.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.
Beehr, T. A., Jex, S. M., Stacy, B. A., & Murray, M. A. (2000). Work stressors and coworker support as predictors of individual strain and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(4), 391–405.
Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural equation modeling: Metode alternatif dengan partial least squares (PLS) (Edisi 4). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.
Haar, J. M., Russo, M., Suñe, A., & Ollier-Malaterre, A. (2014). Outcomes of work–life balance on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and mental health: A study across seven cultures. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 361–373.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Thiele, K. O., Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Anderson, J., & Calantone, R. J. (2017). Mirror, mirror on the wall: A comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 616–632.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103–128.
House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Addison-Wesley.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1–10.
Kossek, E. E., Perrigino, M. B., & Lautsch, B. A. (2022). Work–life flexibility policies from a boundary control and implementation perspective: A review and research framework. Journal of Management, 48(1), 30–60.
Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work-family conflict: A meta-analysis clarifying the influence of general and work-family-specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289–313.
Odle-Dusseau, H. N., Britt, T. W., & Bobko, P. (2012). Work–family balance, well-being, and organizational outcomes: Investigating actual versus desired work/family time discrepancies. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(3), 331–343.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
Saks, A. M. (2019). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement revisited. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 6(1), 19–38.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.
Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M., & De Witte, H. (2019). An ultra-short measure for work engagement: The UWES-3 validation across five countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 577–591.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(1), 6–15.
Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54(3), 392–415.
Žnidaršič, J. (2026). Drivers of work engagement in the private sector: The mediating role of work-life balance and behavioural work-life conflict
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rukma Taufik, Adi Rahmat, Hardi Hardi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
