PENERAPAN METODE MABAC UNTUK EVALUASI PEMAHAMAN MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN

Authors

  • Raja Tama Andri Agus Universitas Royal
  • Rina Julita Universitas Dehasen Bengkulu
  • Suparmadi Universitas Royal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v9i3.6419

Keywords:

MABAC;, comprehensive understanding evaluation;, decision support system;, learning outcomes;, multi-criteria decision making

Abstract

Abstract: This study was conducted to determine how well students understand the Decision Support Systems course using the MABAC method. This study involved five Royal University students as the main subjects. During the learning process, it is often difficult to assess students' comprehensive understanding from only one aspect, so a method that can consider various factors simultaneously is needed. The five students were evaluated using four criteria — Material Understanding (25%), Application & Discussion Participation (30%), Activeness & Technical Skills (30%), and Communication (15%). The targeted output is a scientific article that can serve as a reference for Royal University, in designing a more systematic and objective data-based evaluation system. In this study, previously the assessment was based on several things such as activeness in class, assignment results, exam scores, and participation during lectures. The MABAC method was used because it can help in making decisions based on multiple criteria more objectively. The collected data was then processed to produce a ranking that indicates the level of understanding of each student. The results of the study indicate that the MABAC method can help provide a clearer and more structured picture of student understanding. With this method, lecturers can more easily identify which students have grasped the material well and which still need further guidance. This research is expected to become an alternative way to improve the quality of learning evaluation at Royal University.   Keywords: MABAC; comprehensive understanding evaluation; decision support system; learning outcomes; multi-criteria decision making   Abstrak: Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk melihat seberapa baik mahasiswa memahami mata kuliah Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dengan menggunakan metode MABAC. Penelitian ini melibatkan 5 mahasiswa Universitas Royal sebagai objek utama. Selama proses pembelajaran, sering kali sulit untuk menilai pemahaman mahasiswa secara menyeluruh hanya dari satu aspek, sehingga dibutuhkan metode yang bisa mempertimbangkan berbagai faktor sekaligus. Dari Lima mahasiswa dievaluasi menggunakan empat kriteria — Pemahaman Materi (25%), Penerapan & Partisipasi Diskusi (30%), Keaktifan & Keterampilan teknis (30%), dan Komunikasi (15%). Luaran yang ditargetkan adalah artikel ilmiah yang dapat menjadi referensi bagi Universitas Royal, dalam merancang sistem evaluasi berbasis data yang lebih sistematis dan objektif. Dalam penelitian ini, sebelumnya penilaian dilakukan berdasarkan beberapa hal seperti keaktifan di kelas, hasil tugas, nilai ujian, dan partisipasi selama perkuliahan. Metode MABAC digunakan karena mampu membantu dalam mengambil keputusan berdasarkan banyak kriteria secara lebih objektif. Data yang telah dikumpulkan kemudian diolah untuk menghasilkan peringkat yang menunjukkan tingkat pemahaman masing-masing mahasiswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode MABAC dapat membantu memberikan gambaran yang lebih jelas dan terstruktur mengenai pemahaman mahasiswa. Dengan adanya metode ini, dosen dapat lebih mudah mengetahui mahasiswa yang sudah memahami materi dengan baik maupun yang masih perlu bimbingan lebih lanjut. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi salah satu cara alternatif dalam meningkatkan kualitas evaluasi pembelajaran di Universitas Royal.   Kata kunci: MABAC; evaluasi pemahaman komprehensif; sistem pendukung keputusan; capaian pembelajaran; multi-criteria decision making

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

T. Chaudhari, “USING TECHNOLOGY TOOLS FOR EFFECTIVE STUDENT EVALUATION,” learnqoch.com. [Online]. Available: https://learnqoch.com/technology-tools-effective-student-evaluation/

J. Yang, “Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system and decision support system for learning management of higher education online courses,” pp. 1–18, 2025.

F. Jose, “Learning Outcomes Evaluation Through Learning Analytics Systems in Higher Education : A Systematic Literature Review,” no. September, pp. 1–17, 2025, doi: 10.1177/21582440251347374.

L. Lin, D. Zhou, J. Wang, and Y. Wang, “A Systematic Review of Big Data Driven Education Evaluation,” no. 19, pp. 1–18, 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241242180.

J. W. M. Lai, J. De Nobile, M. Bower, and Y. Breyer, Comprehensive evaluation of the use of technology in education – validation with a cohort of global open online learners. Springer US, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-10986-w.

A. Aini, “Ujian Komprehensif: Pengertian, Penilaian, dan Tips Persiapannya,” glints.com. Accessed: Apr. 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://glints.com/id/lowongan/kompre-adalah-ujian-komprehensif/

H. A. Rakhmatullah, “Apa Itu Ujian Komprehensif? Pengertian dan Tujuannya,” ebizmark.id. Accessed: Apr. 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://ebizmark.id/artikel/apa-itu-ujian-komprehensif-pengertian-dan-tujuannya/

M. Dean, “What Is a Comprehensive Assessment in Education?,” hmhco.com. Accessed: Apr. 10, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.hmhco.com/blog/what-is-a-comprehensive-assessment-in-education

A. E. Torkayesh, E. B. Tirkolaee, A. Bahrini, D. Pamucar, and A. Khakbaz, “A Systematic Literature Review of MABAC Method and Applications : An Outlook for Sustainability and Circularity,” vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 415–448, 2023, doi: 10.15388/23-INFOR511.

T. A. Waruwu, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Menggunakan Metode MABAC,” vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 2023.

D. O. Sihombing, A. Cahyadi, P. Studi, T. Informasi, I. Teknologi, and S. Setia, “Implementasi Metode MABAC Dalam Pemilihan Mahasiswa Terbaik dengan Teknik Pembobotan Rank Sum,” vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1008–1018, 2023, doi: 10.47065/josyc.v4i4.4040.

R. Aditya et al., “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Asisten Laboratorium dengan Menggunakan Metode,” pp. 100–118, 2025.

M. Hariyansa, I. Saluza, and M. F. Alie, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode MABAC pada PT . Adyawinsa Telecommunications & Electrical,” vol. 16, no. 03, pp. 365–372, 2025.

D. Jenderal and P. Tinggi, “Buku Panduan”.

M. Alc, L. Montuori, and J. Rodr, “Multi-Criteria Evaluation Method in the Field of University Education : Application to a Course on Energy Markets,” pp. 40–52, 2023.

F. S. Yuksel, “A systematic literature review on multi-criteria decision making in higher education,” vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 12–28, 2023.

H. Pratiwi, M. Ibnu, and J. D. Hasiholan, “Studi Perbandingan Metode MABAC dan WASPAS dengan Pembobotan ROC dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Supplier Terbaik,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 802–813, 2025, doi: 10.47065/bits.v7i1.7278.

M. Maral, “Examining the Research Performance of Universities with Multi-Criteria Decision- Making Methods,” no. December, pp. 1–22, 2024, doi: 10.1177/21582440241300542.

M. Maral, Evaluation model for research tendencies and performance of universities, vol. 131, no. 1. Springer International Publishing, 2026. doi: 10.1007/s11192-026-05543-y.

S. Andryana, T. Mantoro, A. Gunaryati, and A. E. Raffliansyah, “Improving MCDM University Rankings through Statistical Validation Using Spearman ’ s Correlation and THE Benchmark,” vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1876–1888, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): June 2026

Section

Artikel

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Raja Tama Andri Agus, Rina Julita, Suparmadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>