FILSAFAT ILMU SEBAGAI LANDASAN PENGEMBANGAN MODEL MANAJEMEN BERBASIS KETANGKASAN DAN KETAHANAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v9i1.5726Abstract
Abstract: This study explores the pivotal role of philosophy of science as an ontological, epistemological, and axiological foundation in developing organizational management models based on agility and resilience amid 21st-century VUCA uncertainties. Through a qualitative reflective approach employing conceptual systematic literature review, the research synthesizes fragmented management literature, revealing that agility represents the dynamic essence of organizations as adaptive social systems,, while resilience embodies value-oriented sustainability preserving core identity and long-term purpose. Epistemological pluralism integrates empirical data, tacit knowledge, and contextual reflection, transcending instrumental paradigms. Compared to prior studies focused on operational metrics, this framework offers deeper philosophical reflection, addressing research gaps in ethical and existential dimensions. Theoretical contributions include an integrated tri-dimensional matrix linking philosophy to adaptive capabilities, enriching management discourse. Practical implications urge balanced agility-resilience practices for Indonesian MSMEs and public sectors, emphasizing value-embedded decision-making. Limitations encompass the conceptual nature lacking empirical validation, suggesting future mixed-methods testing across cultural contexts. This work pioneers a normative paradigm shift, positioning philosophically grounded models as essential for sustainable organizational thriving in turbulent environments.. Keywords: Philosophy of Science, Organizational Agility, Organizational Resilience, Management Model, Sustainability. Abstrak: Penelitian ini mengkaji peran fundamental filsafat ilmu sebagai landasan ontologis, epistemologis, dan aksiologis dalam pengembangan model manajemen organisasi berbasis ketangkasan dan ketahanan di tengah ketidakpastian VUCA abad ke-21. Melalui pendekatan kualitatif reflektif dengan desain systematic literature review konseptual, kajian mensintesis literatur manajemen yang terfragmentasi, mengungkap ketangkasan sebagai esensi ontologis organisasi sebagai sistem sosial adaptif, sementara ketahanan mencerminkan orientasi aksiologis keberlanjutan nilai yang mempertahankan identitas inti dan tujuan jangka panjang. Pluralisme epistemologis mengintegrasikan data empiris, pengetahuan tacit, dan refleksi kontekstual, melampaui paradigma instrumental. Dibandingkan studi terdahulu yang berfokus metrik operasional, kerangka ini tawarkan refleksi filosofis mendalam, mengisi kesenjangan dimensi etis-eksistensial. Kontribusi teoretis mencakup matriks tiga dimensi terintegrasi yang hubungkan filsafat dengan kapabilitas adaptif, memperkaya wacana manajemen. Implikasi praktis dorong praktik seimbang ketangkasan-ketahanan bagi UMKM dan sektor publik Indonesia, dengan pengambilan keputusan berbasis nilai. Keterbatasan bersifat konseptual tanpa validasi empiris, sarankan pengujian mixed-method lintas konteks budaya ke depan. Kajian ini mempelopori paradigma normatif baru, memposisikan model berlandaskan filsafat sebagai esensial bagi keberlanjutan organisasi di lingkungan turbulen. Kata kunci: Philosophy of Science, Organizational Agility, Organizational Resilience, Management Model, Sustainability.Downloads
References
Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. SAGE Publications.
Alvesson, M., Ybema, S., & Humphreys, M. (2020). Critical theory and postmodernism in organizational studies. Organization Studies, 41(5), 567-589.
Ambulkar, S., Blackhurst, J., & Grawe, S. (2019). Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination. Journal of Operations Management, 63, 65-82.
Anshori, M., & Agustini, R. (2025). Ketahanan UMKM digital di tengah transformasi industri 4.0: Studi kasus Jawa Timur. Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan, 27(1), 45-62.
Annarelli, A., & Nonino, F. (2021). Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions. Omega, 99, 102271.
Barnett-Page, E., & Thomas, J. (2009). Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 59.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Heinemann.
Chalmers, A. F. (2013). What is this thing called science? (4th ed.). Hackett Publishing.
Chia, R. (2022). Process philosophy and organization studies. Organization Studies, 43(2), 189-210.
Chia, R., & Holt, R. (1997). Strategy without design: The silent efficacy of implicit learning. Cambridge University Press.
Clauss, T., Abebe, M., Tangpong, C., & Hock, M. (2021). Strategic agility, business model innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 68(3), 767-784.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dixon-Woods, M., Bonas, S., Booth, A., Jones, D. R., Miller, T., Sutton, A. J., ... & Young, B. (2006). How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qualitative Research, 6(1), 27-45.
Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13(1), 215-246.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121.
Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. Cambridge Handbook of Research Approaches to Business Ethics and Corporate Responsibility, 1-24.
Gini, A., & Marcoux, A. (2012). The ethics of business: A reconstruction. Routledge.
Hidayat, R., Santoso, A., & Wijaya, T. (2024). Adaptasi digital UMKM pasca-pandemi: Peran kepemimpinan transformasional. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 10(2), 123-140.
Hillmann, J., & Guenther, E. (2021). Organizational resilience: A valuable construct for management research? International Journal of Management Reviews, 23(1), 7-44.
Holmström, J., Brax, S. A., Khanagha, S., & Sjödin, D. (2022). Dynamic capabilities and innovation in servitization. Journal of Business Research, 139, 163-174.
Jabareen, Y. (2009). Building a conceptual framework: Philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(4), 49-62.
Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience. Organizational Dynamics, 40(3), 237-245.
Linnenluecke, M. K. (2022). Resilience in business and management research: A review of dominant approaches and a directions for future research. Journal of Management, 48(1), 5-36.
Macpherson, A., & Jones, O. (2010). Strategies for the development of international entrepreneurship. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 9(3), 357-379.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., ... & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1.
Mulianingsih, R. (2021). Resiliensi komunitas usaha kecil pasca bencana banjir. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 10(3), 456-472.
Nemkova, E., Stone, D., Edwards, J., & Boso, N. (2024). Strategic agility and firm performance: The role of ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 162, 113879.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., Kodama, M., Hirose, A., & Nishimura, Y. (2021). Dynamic fractal organizations. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(4), 511-524.
Nugroho, A., Pratama, R., & Setiawan, B. (2025). Transformasi digital UMKM berbasis agile management. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi, 24(1), 78-95.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P.
M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C.,
Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.
Patriotta, G. (2020). Organizational knowledge in the making. Journal of Management Studies, 57(5), 997-1026.
Paul, J., & Barari, M. (2022). Metaâ€analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how? Psychology & Marketing, 39(6), 1099-1115.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Pratama, A., Susilo, D., & Mariam, S. (2023). Resilience UMKM Indonesia menghadapi krisis ekonomi global. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 21(2), 234-251.
Rahayu, S., & Santoso, B. (2023). Faktor penentu ketahanan organisasi sektor publik Indonesia. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 15(1), 67-84.
Rigby, D., Noble, J., & Bilodeau, D. (2020). Agile organizations converge on the same five management principles. Bain & Company Brief.
Sandberg, J., & Tsoukas, H. (2021). Making sense of making sense. Organization Theory, 2(1), 263178772110101.
Saputra, K., Mulianingsih, R., & Wangke, H. (2022). Pengembangan model ketangkasan UMKM berbasis digital. Jurnal Kewirausahaan dan Usaha Kecil Menengah, 6(2), 112-130.
Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Kohtamäki, M., & Wincent, J. (2020). An agile co-creation process for digital servitization. Journal of Business Research, 112, 478-491.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
Susilo, D., & Mariam, S. (2022). Dampak pandemi COVID-19 terhadap ketahanan UMKM Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen dan Keuangan, 11(1), 89-105.
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45), 1-10.
Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility. California Management Review, 62(1), 13-35.
Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2019). On organizational becoming. Organization, 26(5), 707-722.
Wangke, H., Saputra, K., & Anshori, M. (2025). Model manajemen adaptif untuk organisasi publik Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Kelola Publik, 7(1), 34-52.
Warner, K. S., & Wäger, M. (2020).
Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation. Long Range Planning, 53(4), 101991.
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. SAGE Publications.
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553.
Wulandari, S., & Setiawan, A. (2021). Resiliensi UMKM di tengah disrupsi teknologi. Jurnal Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan, 12(3), 201-218.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112.
