Artikel
PARADIGMA KRITIS DAN AKSIOLOGI DALAM PENGEMBANGAN MANAJEMEN KEINGINAN DI LEMBAGA BISNIS
Diterbitkan 2026-02-04
Cara Mengutip
PARADIGMA KRITIS DAN AKSIOLOGI DALAM PENGEMBANGAN MANAJEMEN KEINGINAN DI LEMBAGA BISNIS. (2026). JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH, 9(1), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.54314/jssr.v9i1.5643
Abstrak
Abstract: This riset conceptually explores the analysis of power structures in the management of desires inside modern business organizations via the lens of critical paradigms and how axiological principles such as justice, sustainability, and autonomy might steer business practices towards enhanced ethicality and introspection. The critical paradigm method aims to "uncover" the concealed mechanisms underlying the formation and regulation of desires (for example, via marketing and self-responsibilization) to expose the ideological hegemony that sustains injustice. The action approach, on the other hand, stresses the importance of making moral ideals a part of company plans and practices. The synthesis of recent literature indicates that in the absence of normative values, business practices are susceptible to manipulation, exploitation, and the abuse of power, including market power. Companies that continuously adhere to ethical norms, such as justice, social responsibility, and openness, tend to exhibit greater competitiveness and longevity. This article asserts that establishing critical paradigms in desire management enhances accountability for socio-ecological consequences, while axiological values function as a normative guide to ensure that businesses do not solely "manage desires" for profit but also honor consumer autonomy, maintain distributive justice, and safeguard environmental sustainability. Practical implications necessitate the establishment of corporate policies that prioritize public welfare, in accordance with OECD guidelines on Responsible Business Conduct, coupled with the enhancement of consumer critical literacy to foster collective awareness that enables structural protections against market dominance##plugins.themes.classic.displayStats.downloads##
##plugins.themes.classic.displayStats.noStats##
Referensi
- Couldry, Nick, & Mejias, Ulises A. (2018). Data Colonialism: Rethinking Big Data’s Relation to the Contemporary Subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632
- Dito Aditia Darma Nst, Renny Maisyarah, Register Launli Buaya, & Juni Yanti Napitupulu. (2024). PENTINGNYA PERAN ETIKA BISNIS DALAM KEBERLANJUTAN PERUSAHAAN BISNIS. Musytari : Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi, Dan Ekonomi, 11(6 SE-Articles), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.8734/musytari.v11i6.8035
- Jones, H., & Arnould, E. (2025). Resisting Financial Consumer Responsibilization Through Community Counter-Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 198(2), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05752-6
- Keller, J., Mcneil, Z., Solaru, D., Wright, L., Leahey, J., & Stawasz, A. (2021). Fowl Play.
- Marbun, F. K., & Catya Wibowo, I. (2025). The anxious generation: How the great rewiring of childhood is causing an epidemic of mental illness. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2025.2477070
- OEDC. (2025). PROMOTING RESPONSIBLE BUSINESS CONDUCT IN THE DEVELOPMENT CO-OPERATION OF AUSTRALIA , JAPAN , KOREA AND NEW ZEALAND. 95.